[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 02:20, Paul Weaver wrote: > On Thursday 18 September 2003 23:27, you wrote: > > Is that the one that claims to be from M$ Program security Dept? If so > > I've got it too. I just hope that my family doesn't recieve a spam like > > that on my Win98 home PC, they would run it... I don't think I can teach > > them to distinguish good attachments from bad, gonna have to try though > > cause else it's gonna be me sorting out their problems. > > Yeah, I had similar one to that - a .bat file which was an executable > (started with MZ). Had about 5 today with large attachments that spam > assassin didnt catch (or did catch but only on one or two stars). Very > annoying if I was on a modem. You lucky lucky bastard ;) so far today I have had somewhere in the region of 60 of these f****rs of varying types, all of the security patch, update or mail undelivered variety. This is not good, but thankfully I am on broadband. -- James jamesk[at]homeric[dot]co[dot]uk "I will have a foreign-handed foreign policy." - George W. Bush
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part