Re: [LUG] More on GPG

[Mike Callaghan <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:49, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 Aug 2003 4:08 pm, Mike Callaghan wrote:
> > All becomes clear now. I thought I had resigned Neil's key with my new
> > key (8D86B65E) but had in fact used one (E5A62DD0) I had generated while
> > playing with gpg on the laptop.
> >
> > 8D86B65E is my new key and is now set as default on both Windows and
> > Linux systems. I have re-signed those keys previously signed with
> > 2801834D.
> >
> > 2801834D has been revoked. Keyservers have been updated for both keys.
> 
> Hmm. by revoking the old key, it makes it harder for me to sign your new key 
> except in person. I cannot now use my verification of the old key as an aid 
> to verifying the new one. As the revoked key is already at keyservers, I'll 
> have to wait until I can verify the new one at a future meeting. (Good excuse 
> for a Cornwall meeting in the autumn!)

<snip>

Ah, I have much to learn. Info noted and will be acted on if need
arises. Thanks again.

-- 
Mike Callaghan
Cornwall
gpg fingerprint: 52C0 1F95 EAF0 3736 D8E0  5F59 E214 5779 8D86 B65E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part