[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
i agree - and i know web designers who spend masses of time checking their sites for diferent OS's browsers etc cos their version of DW can't be trusted to produce decent code. however, doesn't the new dreamweaver MX produce strict/transitional XHTML 1.0/HTML 4.0 if you want it to?-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 03 May 2003 10:21 am, Paul Sutton wrote:
http://www.execulink.com/~cboden/dwlin/
this is a petition to get dreamweaver ported to Linux
paul
Please NO! We need more GOOD sites not more Dreamweaver half-finished tat.
Isn't there enough bad HTML already on the www???
- --
Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk http://www.dclug.org.uk
http://www.wewantbroadband.co.uk/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+s/isiAEJSii8s+MRArmiAKDyMnKUGYF+FF9RGzSbrolvyBu0ZACcDXx5 JfEzZ1cjeb9+ysKloJKL4f4= =08N1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.