[LUG] Reply to list and addresss munging

[Mike <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 13.03.2003 17:06 Mark Evans wrote:
> >
> It would be a pain even more often if people had to cut and
> paste in order to reply to the list :)

Correct, it would be, and if the headers were correct you wouldn't have 
to :-)
But I have used procmail and formail, and now everything works 
correctly.

reply - goes to the sender only
reply all - goes to the sender and the list
reply to list - goes to the list only

Hooray for open source code

Unfortunatly address munging, as it is known, is bad. But people seem 
to like it.
Most like it because the mail clients in use don't support the 'reply 
to list' function.
Or so it seems from reading stuff on the net

 --
'ooroo

Mike...(:)-)
---------------------------------------------------
Email: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx        o
You need only two tools.        o /////
A hammer and duct tape. If it    /@   `\  /) ~
doesn't move and it should use  >  (O)  X<  ~  Fish!!
the hammer. If it moves and      `\___/'  \) ~
shouldn't, use the tape.           \\\
---------------------------------------------------

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.