[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:39:57PM +0000, Neil Williams wrote: > My version of KMail still uses 'inline' signatures that work as plain text > within the body of the message, no attachments involved. Newer versions can > do both, Ximian Evolution only does MIME (I think) and Mozilla/enigmail use > the attachment too. I used Sylpheed (0.7.4, I think) for a while, and switched to Mutt partly because of problems sending encrypted messages to a Calypso-for-Windows user. > The inline method is the older method but it does have the advantage of not > causing grief for those who don't use compliant email readers. Probably the best solution, if this is causing problems, is for me not to sign messages to this list, since I don't want to revert to inline signatures. -- PJR :-) http://www.pjr-online.co.uk/ -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.