[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Saturday 08 February 2003 17:55, you wrote: > The two systems would have to run in parallel. X.400 > If the new system proves successful in real-life use, scales > OK, and achieves its aim to the point where spammers can no > longer abuse the system, then people will eventually close off > SMTP and migration will be complete. It didn't. They didn't. The NHS is abandoning it. Nobody mourns. > I hate to say this, but the biggest and best ally we could > have in making this happen is in Redmond. But I suspect > they'd be on-side for the principle of this, though the cost > would be doing it on their terms. Most NHS implementations of X.400 email systems are in MS Exchange Server. Few worked well. OTOH I have seen and used a rock-solid implementation of a corporate infomration system based on MS ES... -- From one of the Linux desktops of Dr Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/ -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.