[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Theowhat platform is the thin client - browser, terminal server?
In my opinion you have knocked the nail on the head and have my total
support and agreement.
Kev, you can't compare the likes of PHP with ASP.NET as ASP.NET is a
compiled language and not in the dark ages of scripting languages.
Having been a classic ASP scripter for many years, the discovery of
being able to go back to a "proper" language (ASP.NET) was a god sent
for me!!! The speed and detail in which I can write thin client software
now is incredible compared with the amount of time and effort it took
with PHP and ASP.
i do not rubbish everything MS do just because they are MS - that would be fanatical (i.e. closed mind). unfortunately, bill gates is known to not want his software to integrate with other platforms - and his hostility towards OSS is well known. for instance, ISA (the web proxy server) will only work with IE browsers.From a personal point of view, I believe the true winners in software/IT will be those who have an open vision of the future. I find it very hard to take people seriously who mock Microsoft and are prepared to rubbish everything they do. Yes their ethics are far from the best, but how is this any different from the majority of other major corporations.
Unfortunately those of us in the realistic business world will have tofrom years of programming in UNIX/linux and MS i can say from experience that the OS and MS do not mix well. put it this way - if you are using PHP it is best to have it on linux/apache and not some port of PHP which runs on windows/IIS. similarly, if you want to use ASP then use IIS and not chilisoft/apache.
accept that open source and Microsoft will meet and surprising as it may
be to a number of people, the combination might actually be good! It is
those who bury their heads in the sand and ignore the facts, will be the
ones who get left behind.
Theo - thanks very much for your advice, it was extremely helpful andwe have done the work! - there are operating systems, compilers, server apps, utilies, comms apps enough for just about any use. theo is using this MONO stuff now.
open minded. I am very excited about moving onto a Linux platform, but I
guess it does not look like the time is quite right for me. I will enjoy
gaining further knowledge about Linux however until those great
innovators who develop open source systems come up with a solution for
me.
Thank you all for your advice
-----Original Message----- From: owner-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simon Waters Sent: 03 February 2003 22:24 To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [LUG] Web Server
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Zourzouvillys wrote:
On Monday 03 February 2003 6:22 pm, Neil Stone wrote:
thinks oO0(Why the hell would anyone want to use asp.net ??)How much do you know about .NET?
It was called .com last time I used any of it ;-)
C# itself is a very nice language
But Theo you hate Java I thought, so what is it about C# that makes you say it is "nice"?
Convince me you aren't schizophrenic.
Don't get me wrong - i'm helping mono as much as i can to geta decent working
.net from open source, so it's not like we're stuck to windows.
What was the doc saying about MS at their most cuddly.
Without integration to Passport I don't see a future for the strategy - gee yes it'll run on any OS for as long as you per user licence your ADS boxes to oversee security.
The most ironic thing is that microsfot have inadvertentlysolved a number of
long lived problems, one being open source GUI problems. Oneapplication can
be written, then use either the QT (kde) or GTK (gnome)widgets (and other
knobs and buttons) with the flick of a button.
Like show me when it works - sorry impedance mismatch doesn't go away - sure you can code a subset common to all - but QT has done the look like the other OS natively for ages bit if it is asthetics that bother you.
~ Theo, feelign a bit strange saying good thigns aboutmicrosoft products -
first time i've *ever* done it!
I remain to be convinced it isn't just a Java spoiler. Okay my knowledge of it is fairly limited, but then my knowledge of COBRA or GNOME is fairly limited. From here it looks like hanging on Microsoft's coat tails whilst they take a very risky ride.
Why would I advise someone who can get excellent object "brokerage", and development tools in Java for all platforms likely to matter to go for something supporting less platforms, with even more limited Open Source implementations, with less security architecture - all tied to a company renown for it's predatory practices, and poor security.
Sorry it needs a more potent argument that I wrote a program once quite quickly - hell I'd recommend Perl for everything if that was my criteria.
Simon, keen to learn more.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+PuvhGFXfHI9FVgYRAtawAKC259OvRi448VBjwJWCJNidH1z4hwCgs3xB HK8tmy3HkS8ebZqGja5jW7U= =8qu4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.