[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On ti, kesä?? 18, 2002 at 04:56:05 +0100, Ian P. Christian wrote:
Kia wrote:Do you feel the same way with ssh compared to telnet? :)That is different. Secure information gets transferred in this situation, so encription is needed.
Who is Kia? Doesn't outlook do some sort of spell checking ? :)
But, I only sign when I feel that it is needed. I don't think that anyone on this list (well, perhaps a few exceptions) are really lame enough to spoof emails to the list. (although I wouldn't be shocked if someone wanted to prove me otherwise)
It may not happen here, but it could happen in other circumstances which could lead into real problems. We have to set the example. :)
I used to sign all my messages, but got bored of explaining it, and realized that 99% of people I email wouldn't know what to do with it
Well, I do not think there is much point in signing an email to a friend who is using hotmail.com for example, I agree. But if their client can support gpg, why not?
One last point, quite often I do want the ability to deny writing something, especially when proven wrong. :)
Yes, that there is an attractive clause, but I am one of those believers in responsibility and morals etc. etc. I know, I should get my head checked. ;) Check out my cool new SIG!! Oh no, not some more bandwidth wasted I hear you cry. Oh btw, anyone have a recording of the Osbourne show I can "borrow"? ;) -Kai -- http://www.google.com/search?btnI=1&q=Kai+Hendry
Attachment:
pgp00057.pgp
Description: PGP signature