Re: [LUG] Kppp and pppd - differences?

[Simon Waters <Simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John Horne wrote:
> atz

modem reset ?!

> OK
> atm1

speaker on till connection made.

> OK
> atl0

......No idea....?

> OK
> AT&K2

force v42.bis

> OK
> AT&U16

minimum connection 33,600.

> OK
> ATDT1430845-6389891

Is 143 on of those cheapo telecom companies? 
Are they really cheaper for 0845?

> CONNECT 44000/ARQ/V90/LAPM/V42BIS

So far so good.

> ~}#.!}!.} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$.#}%}&.oDh}'}"}(}"g.~~}#.!}!\} }8}"}&} }*} }
> }#}$"
> ~~}#.!}!.} }8}"}&} }*} } }#}$.#}%}&.oDh}'}"}(}"R.~~}#.!}!d} }8}"}&} }*} }
> }#}~NO CARRIER

As I said before I've only seen this sort of thing when using
other authentication methods, I've also heard of some ISPs
skipping authentication. I never got kppp authentication to tie
up with the documentation, I always ended up scripting the
login.

But the methodical approach is to switch on debugging in kppp,
and rip the options being passed to pppd from the log.

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.