[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On Sunday 27 January 2002 10:14 pm, John Botwright Jnr wrote:
For any of you thinking this might be a good idea, think again. I had a
Unfortunately, I have to agree. I had excellent service from Tiscali on the old number. Now I get problems with failed connections - from the debug of the chatscript/pppd, it seems to be the auth pap: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x49 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic ......> <pcomp> <accomp> <endpoint [local ....................]>] which repeats 5 times and then the modem hangs up. I was so relieved at finally getting online with the new number that I posted a little too early - before the problems became a regular occurrence.
Sorry for the rant, but my Desktop PC's PSU just blew up, the arms fell off my chair, I have a cold and I'm feeling a little peeved off at the moment.
:-(
Cheers all, JB. Lo and Behold! Disconnected the second that I pressed "Send"! Now reconnecting it says "LCP terminated by peer" - This is not turning into a good week.
I'm not disconnected, I use two scripts now. I use a dial-on demand as my first line, but if I really need to get online and the dial-on demand drops the line, I stop the on-demand script and use an always-on script, as described in the earlier post. I doesn't get me online any quicker, it just means that once I'm on, I stay on without having to worry about the idle time. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx neil@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.