[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Wednesday 02 Jul 2003 10:51 am, James Keasley wrote: > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:25, Jon Lawrence wrote: > Oh and steve, yes mutt is very nice, and very easy to use for a > command-line (menu driven?) client. Easy to use?? Pardon? I can never get mutt to do anything useful (like retrieve POP3 email). > Juat as a matter of interest, how many people who use gui clients > normally have got the commandline equivalents set up as well, just in > case? Oh no,no,no. KMail and nowt else. It's bad enough having 8 different distros on test without spreading the email over different clients too - let's see, evolution, mutt, Mozilla Mail - 8*3 > too many data stores! (In case that renders differently in your client, I did intend 8 to the power of 3 not 8 x 3.) > Personally I have got two usenet clients, which are actually my > main usenet clients I don't use Pan very often, a mail client an IRC usenet = spam IRC = spam Something else I've already got too much of. (Without SpamAssassin, I'd drown under the spam.) -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk http://www.dclug.org.uk http://www.wewantbroadband.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgp00008.pgp
Description: signature