Re: [LUG] Why HTTP transfer quicker than FTP?

To: lug-list at area51.termisoc.org
Subject: Re: [LUG] Why HTTP transfer quicker than FTP?
From: Simon Waters <Simon.Waters at wretched.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:03:46 +0100
Organization: Eighth Layer Limited
References: <XFMail.001011145732.john at jhorne.csd.plymouth.ac.uk>
Reply-To: lug-list at area51.termisoc.org
Sender: owner-lug-list at area51.termisoc.org

John Horne wrote:
> 
> I would tend to agree, but I've seen this several times with
> transfers from different sites. If the 'trend' is for network devices to
> prefer web transfers, then  obviously it would make sense to use them rather
> than ftp.

Dig dig dig - don't suppose you have a SUN there to play with?

Seen some similar comments with HP to Solaris - and the kernel lists
have some discussions on related topics....
--
lug-list - The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo at lists.termisoc.org with "unsubscribe lug-list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LUG] Why HTTP transfer quicker than FTP?
  - From: John Horne <J.Horne at plymouth.ac.uk>

References:
- Re: [LUG] Why HTTP transfer quicker than FTP?
  - From: John Horne <J.Horne at plymouth.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [LUG] ISDN Monitoring
Next by Date: notime to Surf - was Re: [LUG] ISDN Monitoring
Prev by thread: Re: [LUG] Why HTTP transfer quicker than FTP?
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] Why HTTP transfer quicker than FTP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lynx friendly